民事代办署理词
Statement of Attorney for civil action
The Honorific chief justice and justice:
According to the stipulations about the power of attorney stip-ulated by the civil procedure law and the Act of Lawyer, Sichuan Junhe law firm assigns me as the Action Agent in the A VS B case according to the delegation by A. now I have attended the first instance.
Both the interested parties have given proof to support their claims and to retort the other’s claims during today’s court trial. And now I think the focal point disputed by the two parties is whether the counterclaim defendant’s acts constitute a breach of contract. As the Action Agent designated by the party who makes the counterclaim, I am responsible to bring up such following opinions to make the truth clear.
1、the defendant of the counterclaim commits a heavy breaches of contract
In April 23rd, 2008 the defendant of the counterclaim bought some exhibits sold as bargain price from the plaintiff of the counterclaim at the price of RMB13200，and he first made a deposit of RMB 4200. In accordance with the article 8 of such contract concluded by the tow parties, the defendant of the counterclaim should pay the difference payment for the goods and pick up the goods within 2 weeks after the contract comes into effects. And the two parties agreed in the contract that the seller should delivery the goods around June.
According to this agreement stipulated in the contract, the defendant of the counterclaim undertakes the responsibility of making a payment of the money remaining and making a pick up of the goods within 14 days. But the defendant of the counterclaim neither paid the money nor made a pick up till 5 months later (on August 10th, 2008).
During those days, the plaintiff of the counterclaim made telephone calls many times to ask the defendant to make payment of 9000 yuan and pick up, but the defendant refused to answer the calls. Because of this the plaintiff had no access to exercise his right of collecting the reminding payment for goods and perform the responsibility of delivery the goods.
According to the regulations of the article 60 of the contract law, the the person(s) involved should perform his (their) responsibility absolutely and fully, and should abide by the principle of good faith and be responsible of notice, assistance and confidential maintaining according to the nature and purpose of the contract and usage of trade. In such case, the defendant
To sum up, the reason why the aim of the selling contract in the case is not reached is that the defendant of the counterclaim has breached the law and the agreement, and the defendant shall undertake the corresponding legal liability. The claim of the plaintiff is justified by the clear facts and sufficient proofs. Now I request to court to support the plaintiff’s claim according to the law.
To
The people’s court of the jinjiang district, chengdu
Attorney:Zhegn shuhong lawyer group
XXX XXX, 2008
民事代办署理词
尊崇的审讯长、审讯员：
根据我国民事诉讼法和律师法有关代办署理权的规定，四川君合律师事务所根据本案反诉人成都圣地亚实业集团公司拜托，指派我为其担任被反诉人邱梅与圣地亚买卖合同纠纷一案诉讼代办署理人，依法参与本案一审诉讼活动。
颠末今天法庭开庭审理，当事人两边对各自举证及对方举证依法量证，我认为本案争议焦点应为：1、被反诉人有无违约行为；2、该买卖合同能否应该去除；3、反诉人要求反诉被告付出仓储费能否成立？围绕以上问题，我做为反诉方诉讼代办署理人，有责任向法庭提出以下代办署理定见，以便法庭在评断本案时兼听则明。
反诉被告存在严峻的违约行为
2008年4月23日反诉被告购置了反诉人根据特价处置的展品，约订价款为13200元，先期付出定金4200元。同时根据两边签定该买卖合同第8条的约定，反诉被告应当于合同生效后两周内补交余款9000元同时提货。同时，合同约定了送货的最迟期限为2008年6月摆布。
根据该第8条的约定，反诉被告承担期限在两周内付出余款并提货的义务。但是，合同签定后反诉被告不断没有交纳该笔剩余款项也没有向反诉人发出提货的恳求。曲到时隔五个半月之后，即2008年8月10日才到反诉人处提出提货恳求。期间，反诉人屡次德律风联络反诉被告，要求其根据约定交付剩余9000元货款并及时提货。但是，每次德律风联络时反诉被告均不予接听，以致反诉人无法行使收取剩余货款的权力，同时，也使得反诉人无法完成送货。根据合同法第六十条的规定：“当事人应当根据约定全面履行本身的义务。当事人应当遵照诚恳信誉原则，根据合同的性量、目标和交易习惯履行通知、帮忙、保密等义务。”本案中，反诉被告不严厉根据合同的约定全面履行本身提货和付出货款的义务，也没有遵照诚恳信誉原则尽到通知的义务。因为反诉被告的那些行为，招致反诉人的合同权力无法实现，也使得反诉人无法履行其响应的义务，因而，反诉被告的行为是严峻的违约行为。
综上，本案《经销合同》约定事项未达约定目标,系被告违背法令和合同约定形成,理应承担由此产生的法令后果。原告提起本案诉讼,其主张及相关证据,事实清晰,证据足够,恳求法庭对原告诉求依法准诉。
此致
成都会锦江区人民法院
代办署理人：郑书宏律师团
2009年1月3日